September 10, 2009
Renting usually is cheaper than owning. In really expensive cities, such as New York and San Francisco, renting is so much cheaper that it’s tough to make the case for becoming a homeowner. Buying in these markets often means settling for a much worse property or an awful commute, compared with what you can afford if you continue to rent. You’re not really throwing money away when you send a check to your landlord, anyway. You’re exchanging it for a place to live. You’re also getting flexibility and freedom — things you sacrifice when you buy a home. When you’re a renter, it’s the landlord, not you, who is generally responsible for maintenance, repairs and fixing the toilet that blows up in the middle of the night. If the neighborhood should start to slide or you get or lose a job, you can up and move, often with just a few weeks’ notice.
  1. pixelintelligence reblogged this from marco
  2. dustinblake reblogged this from marco
  3. fielderblank reblogged this from rickwebb
  4. rickwebb reblogged this from marco
  5. sfhaps reblogged this from marco
  6. nirak reblogged this from ragdoll
  7. giantrobotlasers reblogged this from rafer
  8. rafer reblogged this from marco
  9. ragdoll reblogged this from marco and added:
    marco) Several good reasons...keep on renting, especially
  10. marco reblogged this from peterwknox and added:
    wiesen, peterwknox) I’d love to buy a place, but this is accurate: for any area in New York that provides a tolerable...
  11. pink-squirrel reblogged this from peterwknox
  12. skimmingthesurface reblogged this from peterwknox
  13. peterwknox reblogged this from stevegarfield
  14. stevegarfield reblogged this from mikehudack
  15. mikehudack reblogged this from wiesen
  16. meckz reblogged this from wiesen
  17. wiesen posted this